
IMAGE COPYRIGHT GETTY IMAGES image caption Filmmakers in India have battled censorship for decades.
The changes, if passed, allow the government to “re-examine” a film already cleared by the censor board.
Filmmakers say the proposals are an attack on their freedom of expression.
Films cannot be publicly exhibited in India unless they have been certified by the board, which is based in Mumbai and has regional offices.

Filmmakers in India have battled censorship for decades. Successive governments, religious communities and right-wing groups have all taken offence.
Films have been banned and pulled from theatres or festivals, often forcing directors to make the necessary cuts and revisions.
Filmmakers fear that the new rules proposed by the Narendra Modi-led BJP government will make the process even more stifling.
Known as the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 2021, the proposed new rules will give the federal government certain “revisionary powers”.
This means the government can revoke the certification of a film – based on viewer complaints – even if the censor board sees no problem with its content.
Earlier this week, a group of leading actors and filmmakers shot a letter to the government, opposing the provisions.
They said the changes would add an additional layer of censorship that goes beyond the existing process.
“This will also render filmmakers powerless at the hands of the state as more vulnerable to threats, vandalism and intimidation of mob censors,” the signatories added.

However, Shyam Benegal, one of India’s most celebrated directors, has said the proposed rules are “fine, [and] there are no major problems”.
“If a film is given a certificate, it does not mean that it is forever…So, there are some things that have been valid at one time [in the past] and they may not be valid today. So recalling films [for another review] is not a big deal,” Benegal told Hindustan Times newspaper.
Mr Modi’s government has come under increasing criticism from rights activists and opposition leaders for allegedly censoring free speech and stifling dissent.
