data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d3f/03d3f48664816dae945da7c3145cf76b74ce574e" alt="Meng Wanzhou: The PowerPoint that sparked an international row"
IMAGE SOURCE GETTY IMAGES image caption Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou could leave for China on Saturday
By Gordon Corera
Security correspondent
On Friday, prosecutors announced that a request to extradite her to the US had been dropped.
During the three years of intense legal battles, Canada was caught in the escalating tension between Washington and Beijing.
At the centre of the story is a sixteen-page corporate PowerPoint presentation.
Vancouver stopover and an arrest
When her plane from Hong Kong landed, Meng Wanzhou planned to go to a house she owned in the Canadian city to collect some luggage before catching another flight to Mexico for a corporate meeting.
But instead she was questioned by Canadian border security agents for three hours as her phone was seized and luggage searched.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a99fe/a99fe83274790482b5563e198d69b8f26d2875d9" alt="Media stand outside the home of Meng Wanzhou as they wait for her to leave for a court appearance in Vancouver"
When that was over, she was formally admitted into Canada. It was at this point that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police moved in and arrested her because of an extradition request filed by the US.
A PowerPoint at the heart of the case
The PowerPoint was used by Ms Meng at a meeting with the bank HSBC on 22 August 2013, and is seen as key evidence against her.
Reuters news reports in the preceding months had raised questions about whether there had been a breach of trade sanctions on Iran by Hong Kong-based firm Skycom.
At issue was whether Skycom, a telecoms equipment seller, was simply a business partner of Huawei’s – or a front for it to conceal its activities in Iran.
The US alleged that in the meeting – the one with the PowerPoint presentation – Ms Meng misled HSBC over the true nature of Huawei’s relationship with Skycom and this, in turn, put the bank at risk of violating sanctions against Iran.
Meng’s lawyers launch legal fight
Ms Meng’s lawyers launched a multi-pronged attack on the US extradition request itself.
An initial attempt to claim that the crime for which she is charged in the US is not a crime in Canada failed (although that can be appealed).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/984d4/984d4edc2dd2348b54b6a142424278d0b95b9776" alt="David Martin. attorney for Meng Wanzhou, walks into the court registry following her bail hearing in Vancouver"
Another challenge centred on politics around the case.
Her lawyers claimed that comments made by US President Donald Trump, which indicated a willingness to use the case as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations with China, constituted an abuse of process.
Another challenge related to her treatment at the airport in Vancouver. Her lawyers argued there was an abuse of process in the way she was treated.
A judge turned down requests for some documents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0b8d/e0b8d4f99951ede3fca5c288540ba022ca3a9f1c" alt="Meng Wanzhou is escorted b y security as she leaves her home on May 2019 in Vancouver"
It was thought that the case could take between five and 10 years to come to a conclusion.
Last month, Ms Meng appeared in court as a judge heard the final arguments about whether to send her to the US. Her case was also raised in high-level discussions between senior US and Chinese diplomats.
Huawei executives were also in touch with the US government to try and secure her release.
And then on Friday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it had reached a deferred prosecution agreement. This means that the DOJ will hold off from prosecuting Ms Meng until late next year and if she complies with conditions set by the court, the case will eventually be dropped.
A person with knowledge of the case told the BBC that she could fly back to China as soon as Saturday.
Geopolitical repercussions
The impact of the case has rippled far and wide.
The arrest of such a high-profile business figure led to anger in China. The country’s ambassador said China had been “taken advantage of” and made an “accomplice” by America as Washington carried out a “barbaric act of bullying”.
HSBC was put in a difficult position with Chinese media questioning how far the bank co-operated with the US in building the case they described as a politically driven trap.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e816b/e816bc2c5999995c9297488bd815adbd596ec0c3" alt="HSBC sign above banks cash point machines Soho"
The bank, already caught between the West and China over its stance on Hong Kong, maintained it only did what it was legally required to do and that there was no entrapment.
The case has also raised broader questions over which countries might arrest business executives if they were to receive requests from the US.
It has led to concern that Western businessmen and other travellers could find themselves detained by China to be used as bargaining chips.
Two Canadians were detained days after Ms Meng’s arrest. Michael Kovrig, a former diplomat, and Michael Spavor, a businessman, were later charged with spying.
Last month, a Chinese court sentenced Spavor to 11 years in prison.
China has denied any link but the pair’s detention has been widely interpreted as a direct response to Ms Meng’s arrest.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51fac/51fac7fa43f185652cfcc384b3db5b627a5cb808" alt="Protesters hold signs calling for the release of Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig"